​​Louis Chua said: A company that spends $50K on AI subscriptions can deduct up to $200K. An individual gets a single six-month subscription to a premium AI tool, and only if enrolled in a selected AI course. Why does the government give businesses an enhanced deduction for AI subscriptions but give individuals only a time-limited cost subsidy? Louis Chua is comparing apples with oranges. A $200K tax deduction for businesses is not $200K in subsidies. It reduces taxable income. A six-month AI subscription to an individual, on the other hand, is a direct subsidy for him. At the headline cor

Yet he is the preferred leader of some opposition supporters. 👍3❤1

Strange that a tax on wealth is described as a motivation for the wealthy to give back to society. A motivation is an incentive, not a compulsion. In that respect, a tax can hardly be described as a motivation. If any, it is the exact opposite of motivation. But there is a way to turn taxation into a motivation to do good. It's really simple: tax relief for giving to charitable donations. Reward people for giving back to society, rather than tax them and call it motivation. ❤2👍2